Washington's portfolio has grown

The Commerce Department announced agreements this week with seven semiconductor companies for $874 million in CHIPS Act funding.
In exchange for part of that support, the government is set to receive minority equity stakes in six additional chipmakers.

That would bring Washington's growing collection of corporate holdings to roughly 30 companies, according to a Cato Institute tally.

And this portfolio stretches well beyond semiconductors. We're talking steel, nuclear energy, rare earths, and other strategically important industries.

There's also a pretty good reason Washington might be warming to the strategy.

Here's the full picture.

SPONSOR BREAK presented by MarketWise*

Elon Musk's 'Trojan Horse'

Everyone is focused on the rockets. That's exactly what Elon wants… Hidden inside the S-1 is a $1.3 trillion AI "trojan horse" Wall Street completely missed. Rob Spivey – whose institutional research is followed by Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, BlackRock, and Fidelity – called Elon's last three big moves before anyone else. When Elon makes a big move, billions of dollars move, too. All you have to do is follow the money… Rob is giving away his No. 1 stock recommendation at the center of Elon's hidden empire, free…

Meet The Seven.

1\ GlobalFoundries — $300M - Co-packaged optics that could move data between AI processors using light, with the funding intended to accelerate development by 2–3 years.

2\ Kepler — $245M - Next-generation AI memory built around 3D and ferroelectric technologies, aimed at improving performance as AI systems demand more memory.

3\ Multibeam — $140M - Advanced chip-packaging technology designed to stack and connect multiple chips into more powerful computing systems.

4\ Extropic, Thintronics, OBSIDIA & Aeluma — $30M–$75M each - A mix of lower-power computing, advanced semiconductor materials, and technology designed to detect counterfeit components.

The government isn't simply writing checks. As National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) explained, each award comes with a minority, non-controlling equity stake intended to give taxpayers some participation in the upside.

Exactly how much ownership? That's still TBD.

These are currently letters of intent, and the final equity stakes haven't been disclosed. Those details are expected to be worked out before the awards are finalized in the months ahead.


SPONSOR BREAK presented by Brownstone*

What is Trump's decade-long obsession?

No president has moved markets like Trump.

He has a history of adding and wiping trillions from a market, seemingly at will.

But Larry says all of that was just the warm-up.

Because one plan has obsessed Trump for over a decade. Larry believes it's about to send billions flooding into a single ticker.

If you want to get ahead of Trump's next move – check out this presentation with Larry where he gives the name of that ticker for free.
Click here now while you're still early..


 

Three Times

GlobalFoundries has now received federal semiconductor funding three separate times—and the evolution of those deals shows just how much Washington's approach has changed.

November 2024 — $1.5B - Funding to expand manufacturing facilities in Malta, New York, and Vermont. No government equity stake.

May 2026 — $375M - Part of a broader quantum-computing funding round. This time, the government received roughly a 1% stake in GlobalFoundries.

July 2026 — $300M - This week's investment in co-packaged optics R&D. An equity stake is part of the deal, though the government's eventual ownership percentage hasn't been disclosed.

GlobalFoundries offers perhaps the clearest example of Washington's shift: federal support once came primarily as funding. Increasingly, it comes with ownership attached.

This new form of AI could create so much wealth that Elon Musk calls it "an infinite money glitch."

The CEO of Nvidia, Jensen Huang, is on record predicting this will be "the next wave" of the AI boom…

And that it will launch "the next multi-trillion-dollar industry."


The Flagship Example

If Washington needed a reason to keep taking equity, Intel has provided a rather compelling one.

The stock has climbed to record highs since the government's investment was announced, leaving its stake sitting on more than $70 billion in unrealized gains.

The broader debate over whether the government should own pieces of private companies isn't going away.

But purely on paper, Intel has worked exceptionally well.

SPONSOR BREAK presented by MarketWise*

The Prophet's" #1 Retirement Stock Right Now — Free

Whitney Tilson — the man CNBC calls "The Prophet," twice featured on 60 Minutes — is revealing the name and ticker of what he calls America's Greatest Retirement Stock.

Completely free.

It's already outperformed Apple, Amazon, and the S&P 500 combined...

A billionaire put 60% of his $9 billion fund into it...

And Google's former CEO just partnered with it directly.

Right now it's trading at a rare discount.


 

It's Not Just Chips

Washington's portfolio is starting to look diversified.

And that's before adding semiconductors and quantum computing.

The government now holds interests across chips, quantum computing, steel, nuclear energy, and rare earths—industries Washington considers strategically important to U.S. manufacturing, technology, energy, or national security.

The common thread is increasingly equity.

Instead of providing capital and walking away, Washington is beginning to structure more deals so taxpayers retain a piece of the companies receiving it.

Industrial policy is starting to come with a cap table.

⚠️ Not Everyone Is Buying The Strategy.

The equity approach has critics.

The disagreement comes down to the government's role in private markets.

Free-market critics argue that government should fund strategic priorities without becoming a shareholder.
The administration sees it differently: if taxpayer dollars are already going into private companies, taxpayers should have a chance to participate in the upside.

Intel's gains strengthen the financial case. They don't resolve the broader policy debate.

With roughly 30 companies now in the mix, this is becoming more than a handful of unusual deals. It's an evolving model for how Washington supports industries it considers strategically important.

Whether that ultimately proves to be smart taxpayer stewardship, useful industrial policy, or a significant expansion of government ownership will depend largely on what happens to those investments from here.

Don’t forget to cast your vote 👇

Poll of the day:

If taxpayer money funds a company, should taxpayers get a stake?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Lesson Of The Day:

Was this email forwarded to you? Don’t miss out on future stories — subscribe using the button below.

Also, help your friends blossom this spring! Share us with them.

💬 We Want To Hear Your Story:

Got a market or stock you want us to analyze next?

Just drop your request in the comments here.

P.S. - If you no longer want to receive occasional emails from us and you want to unsubscribe, click here 👉 “Unsubscribe” . Thank you!

Disclaimer: This letter is not offering investment, trading, or investment advice nor is based on any individual portfolio or business operation. We are not a registered investment, stock nor commodity advisor. One should consult with their own registered advisor to discuss investment strategies that are appropriate for their business or personal goals, risk tolerance and financial situation. Information in this report and on any website is derived from a variety of source believed to be reliable however no representation is made that the information is accurate, complete or correct. These lessons, newsletter and site content is not intended nor shall not constitute or be construed as an offer or recommendation to “buy”, “sell”, “trade” or invest in any securities, commodities, futures, options or other asset referred to in said lessons, reports or newsletters. Rather, this research is intended to identify situations and circumstances that those in the trading community should be aware of to better help assess and improve their own risk management skills.

This publication is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute investment, trading, or financial advice and is not based on any individual’s financial circumstances, goals, or risk tolerance. We are not registered investment, stock, or commodity advisors. Always consult a licensed financial professional before making investment decisions.Information provided in this newsletter (and on any affiliated website) is obtained from sources believed to be reliable; however, accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and are subject to change without notice.

From time to time, this publication may include sponsored content, affiliate links, or advertisements. Such inclusions do not constitute endorsements, and any compensation received does not influence the analysis or opinions presented. TradingLessons is not affiliated with, nor does it verify or guarantee the claims, products, or services of any sponsor or advertiser. Readers should perform their own due diligence before engaging with any advertised offerings.

Nothing herein should be interpreted as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation to buy, sell, or trade any security, commodity, derivative, or other financial instrument. This content is intended solely to highlight market developments and educational insights to help readers enhance their understanding of trading and risk management.


Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Recommended for you